Stormfront.org, ¿Locura masiva? ¿Bipolaridad extrema? ¿Esquizofrénicos?

-Hitler sube al poder en Alemania en 1933. En las cancillerías occidentales les tiemblan las rodillas de emoción con el nuevo fichaje: el antídoto contra el bolchevismo. Lo de los judíos, que no había derechos políticos y tal... bueno esas cosas no eran importantes en 1933 para los mandamases de la política internacional, que a fin de cuentas, hacían parecidas cosas en sus colonias. Ya he puesto en antencedetes.

-La URSS intenta buscar la "seguridad colectiva" que aislase a Hitler. Éste iba a ser el principio rector de la política soviética hasta 1939. En cambio las potencias occidentales, Gran Bretaña sobre todo, iban a buscar a empujar a Hitler contra la URSS. (Política de "apaciguamiento", lo llaman).

-Polonia firma en 1934 un Pacto de Amistead con Alemania. (A partir de aquí, en numerosas ocasiones, Beck el ministro de exteriores polaco iba a nombrear el tema de la Ukrania Soviética cuando hablase con Hitler o con los alemanes).

Pacto de no agresión NAZI-Polaco
[Tienes que estar registrado y conectado para ver este vínculo]

-Gran Bretaña firma un acuerdo con Alemania en 1935 en el cual se le permite tener la paridad militar con otras potencias. Éste acuerdo anula automáticamente muchas de las cláusulas de Versailles.

-En 1935 la Italia fascista ataca Abisinia. Nadie sabe nada, nadie mira nada, nadie oye nada, nadie dice nada.

-Se firma el Pacto Antikomintern en 1936 entre Alemania y Japón con vista a atacar a todo el mundo sabe el qué. Alemania reconoce el Estado-títere de Manchukuo (Manchuria) en la frontera entre China y URSS.

-Alemania, Italia, Portugal y Marruecos apoyan el golpe de Estado fascista en España. Los occientales se siguen apaciguando a tres manos con el Comité ese que ni Dios sabe qué es.



Chamberlain

In 1936 the Conservative government feared the spread of communism from the Soviet Union to the rest of Europe. Stanley Baldwin, the British prime minister, shared this concern and was fairly sympathetic to the military uprising in Spain against the left-wing Popular Front government.

Leon Blum, the prime minister of the Popular Front government in France, initially agreed to send aircraft and artillery to help the Republican Army in Spain. However, after coming under pressure from Stanley Baldwin and Anthony Eden in Britain, and more right-wing members of his own cabinet, he changed his mind.

Baldwin and Blum now called for all countries in Europe not to intervene in the Spanish Civil War. A Non-Intervention Agreement was drawn-up and was eventually signed by 27 countries including the Soviet Union, Germany and Italy. However, Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini openly ignored the agreement and sent a large amount of military aid, including troops, to General Francisco Franco and his Nationalist forces.


[Tienes que estar registrado y conectado para ver este vínculo]





-Italia entra en el Pacto Anti-Komintern en 1937.

-En 1938 Alemania se anexiona Austria. Inglaterra en los días previos había mandado mensajes diciendo que "no podía garantizar la integridad e independencia de Austria". "era en vano hacer creer a las naciones débiles en la ilusión de que alguien, la Sociedad de Naciones u otra potencia, iba a garantizar su independencia". El Anschluss viola una cláusula del Pacto de Varsailles.

-El 29 de Septiembre de 1938 firman el acuerdo de Munich dos potencias "democráticas"; Francia e Inglaterra, y dos potencias fascistas; Alemania e Italia. En dicho acuerdo se satisfacen las pretensiones de Alemania sobre los Sudetes "alemanes" de Checoslovaquia, que deberán pasar a soberanía alemana. Además Hungría iba a tomar algunas tierras del sur de Eslovaquia y Polonia participa en el festival tomando la región de Zaolzie. Checoslovaquia no estuvo presente en la reunión, no se le permitió, le exigieron "esperar fuera". No olvidemos que éste acuerdo según Chamberlain era "paz en nuestro tiempo" en Europa. A la URSS no se le permitió estar en ese acuerdo, con lo cual claramente significaba "aislamiento de la URSS". Además no olvidemos un detalle: la URSS tenía un acuerdo militar con Checoslovaquia. Y le ofreció ayuda, que los checoslovacos prefirieron rechazar, ya que no veían posibilidades de resistir aun con ayuda soviética. Por lo tanto este pacto fue indirectamente ua agresión contra la URSS. Otro detalle: en la alianza soviético-checoslovaca también estaba Francia, cuya posición fue abiertamente rastrera y traidora. La alianza soviético-francesa queda así anulada, y la soviético-checoslovaca, tocada del ala.

-Al día siguiente, el 30 de Septiembre, Neville Chamberlain, primer ministro inglés, visita el apartamento de Hitler y fr¡irma en nombre del Gobierno británico un Pacto de No Agresión con Alemania.

My good friends, this is the second time in our history that there has come back from Germany to Downing Street peace with honour. I believe it is peace for our time. We thank you from the bottom of our hearts. And now I recommend you to go home and sleep quietly in your beds


[Tienes que estar registrado y conectado para ver este vínculo]

-En Diciembre de 1938, Bonnet Ministro de Exteriores francés y Ribbentrop ministro de Exteriores alemán firman Pacto de No Agresión entre Francia y Alemania

-En el mismo 1938 Polonia presenta un ultimátum a Lituania, con la que no se hablaba desde 1920 (por el asunto Vilnius); exigiendole la restitución de relaciones diplomáticas, que Lituania dejase de reivindicar Vilnius y "protección para la minoría polaca de Lituania". Si no, guerra. Alemania apoya el ultimátum polaco contra Lituania.

-En el mismo 1938 Alemania presenta otro ultimatum a Lituania exigiendole la ciudad portuaria de Klaipeda (Memel). Si no, guerra. Polonia apoya el ultimatum germano contra Lituania.

-El 15 de Marzo de 1939 Alemania invade lo que queda de Checoslovaquia, se anexoina Chequia ("Protectorado de Bohemia y Moravia")y Eslovaquia es declarada independiente bajo un régimen-títere, el de Tiso. Esta invasión viola laas cláusulas del Pacto de Munich. Los occidentales ni están ni se les espera. Ya ves tú cuánto les importaba la "paz de nuestro tiempo". A raíz de ésta invasión Hungría también gana territorios.

-Gran Bretaña y Francia reconocen al Gobierno golpista de Burgos (alaido de Hitler) antes de qeue acabe la guerra civil española.

-La URSS busca pactos con las potencias occidentales "democráticas". En Abril de 1939, la URSS hace una propuesta de acuerdo de seguridad colectiva a Inglaterra, Francia, Polonia y Rumania. Inglaterra y Francia responden con largas, ppiden un compromiso unilateral a la URSS en la que se comprometa a entrar en guerra en caso de ataque alemán, ahora bien ellos no se comprometen a nada. Siguen las charlas, hasta que por la presión popular (más del 80% tanto en Inlglaterra como en Francia estaba a favor de un pacto con la URSS por el hecho de que eso podía significar asegurar la paz), Inglaterra y Francia aceptan el 25 de Julio una propuesta de conversaciones en Moscú para un acuerdo con la URSS. Polonia y Rumania se nuegan, duarnte éste tiempo, Rydz-Smigly, jefe del Estado mayor polaco dice que "Polonia sóla puede enfrentar cualquier agresión sea por parte de Alemania o por parte de la URSS". El embajador polaco en Moscú, Grzybowski dice que "polonia ni se plantea firmar ningún tipo de tratado con la URSS". Polonia y Rumanía tenía den hecho un tratado de defensa mutua en caso de ataque soviético.

-El 26 de Julio Alemania empieza a hacer propuestas a la URSS para un Pacto de No Agresión, al tiempo que va concentrando sus tropas en la frontera con Polonia.

-En Agosto de 1939 la URSS hace el último esfuerzo para pactar la seguridad colectiva con Francia y Gran Bretaña. Francia y Gran Bretaña mandan sus delagaciones a Moscú ¡el 12 de Agosto, 18 días más tarde, con personas de segundo orden y sin poderes para negociar! (y eso que el peligro de guerra era inminente) Los soviéticos, alucinaus. El 15 de agosto reciben pderes "para negociar pero no para firmar nada". Los británicos y franceses no quieren negociar, van más a hacer preguntitas y a averiguar que a otra cosa ("¿Podéis atacar con vuestros aviones a Alemania desde territorio soviético?", "¿Cuantas divisiones tenéis en la frontera?"). Polonia y Rumania se niegan a dejar que los soviéticos pasen por su territorio en caso de guerra contra Alemania. Vista la poca seriedad de los aliados y sus nulas ganas, el 22 de Agosto se acaban las conversaciones. Ese día Doumenc (jefe de la edlegación francesa) comunica que ha recibido poderes para negociar, pero que la delegación inglesa no las ha recibido. (Al mismo tiempo, Inglaterra estaba en negociaciones con Alemania, mientras que no había mandado a delegaciones de segunda fila y sin poderes a la URSS más que charlar). Y que Polonia y Rumanía se negaban categóricamente al paso de las tropas soviéticas por su erritorio para atacar Alemania en algún caso. La única alternativa para la URSS era o firmar un pacto con Alemania o hacerlo únicamente con Francia. Ésta segunda opición tenía sus fallos, ya que Francia ya había triacionado a Checoslovaquia y a la URSS en 1938 en Munich.

-El 23 de Agosto, la URSS firma el Pacto de No Agresión con Alemania.

¿Damos importancia a la raza? Si, pero que defendamos lo blanco no quiere decir que detestemos al negro, chino, magrebí o hispanoamericano. Simplemente somos conscientes de nuestra herencia blanca y queremos preservarla, pero ello no significa que peguemos palizas a los demás, yo nunca lo he hecho.

Eh! Negro vuelve a la selva
Europa es blanca y no es tu tierra.
Robando y mendigando quereís vivir
los jóvenes blancos, orgullosos skins
tarde o temprano os sacaremos de aqui.
Eh! Negro vuelve a la selva
Europa es blanca y no es tu tierra
Eh! Negro vuelve a la selva
Europa es blanca y no es tu tierra.
PODER BLANCO

Encima de algunos comentarios he leído lo de que el espíritu NS no va con el carácter latino o sur europeo. Yo, en primer lugar, estoy en contra de dividir las razas en "subrazas": para mi es igual de blanco un nórdico que un español o un anglosajón, de igual forma que no diferencio entre un etiope y un subsahariano o entre un coreano y un taiwanés.

el NS ensalza el valor, la entrega, el honor y la fidelidad. Estas características, que han marcado el devenir de Europa, están presentes en el vikingo, en el soldado de los tercios españoles o en el soldado de las SS.

donjuantenorio escribió:muy bueno lo tuyo ss 18 con eso que pusiste lo mataste como explicas esas fotos esos tipos son unos sadicos . Ver esas fotos de pibes llorando ya no necesitas saber mas man, alguien que la sabia larga. Cpablo no se si es el mejor momento pero para mi las razas existen pero somos todos iguales hermanos a pesar de que muchos no lo ven asi y tambien entre muchos supuestos compañeros vi actitudes esteticas, no se como decirlo ustedes me entienden yo se que si. Por ejemplo uno de mis mejores amigos que trabaja conmigo en el torno es negro de piel y le decimos negro ruben con cariño su color es negro y se ve man! pero es capo capo mal si lo conces o sea si es diferente pero solo en el color como el chocolate blanco y el negro los dos son ricos.


hasta la victoria***

Uno de los tópicos más preciados por los admiradores del III Reich es que los nacionalsocialistas, en realidad, lo que querían era liberar a los pueblos de Europa del bolchevismo, a Sudamérica del capitalismo estadounidense y al planeta en general del colonialismo. Que si cometieron “algún exceso”, fue obligado por el transcurso de la guerra y los malvados resistentes a su labor civilizadora. Pero este discurso de Himmler en una reunión con sus Gruppenführers revela otra cosmovisión, antes de que las derrotas militares y el rechazo de la Wehrmacht obligase a las Waffen SS a acoger voluntarios de toda laya.

Este discurso fue pronunciado para los más altos cargos de las SS en febrero de 1937, cuando los nazis apenas han remilitarizado el Sarre y participan más o menos disimuladamente en la guerra civil española. Faltan 13 meses para el Anschluss, 20 para los pactos de Munich, y dos años para que Hitler incumpla esos mismos pactos y disuelva lo que queda de Checoslovaquia, incumpliendo de paso también todas las garantías que había dado sobre que no aspiraba incorporar ningún territorio que no fuera “de cultura alemana”.

Reunión de jefes de grupo de la SS (rango equivalente a generales de división), en Bad Tölz, junto a la frontera austríaca, 18 de febrero de 1937 :

A veces, en círculos nacionalistas se sueña con que algún día conquistaremos el mundo. Yo también pienso así, aunque por ahora no hablemos de eso. Pero también soy consciente de que debemos actuar por etapas. Hoy día, no tendríamos los hombres suficientes para colonizar ni siquiera otra provincia, otra zona o un país que fuera sólo la mitad de grande que Alemania. Que tampoco podemos hacernos cargo de población alguna es algo que también está claro. Y de que barreremos hasta la última abuela y el último niño –sin piedad— si tenemos que hacernos cargo de una provincia que no sea de sangre germánica, de eso espero que tampoco quepa duda; ni de que entonces necesitaremos a la población, la racialmente buena, para asentarla allí, para comenzar, sin más, a reasentar y criar en torno a la Alemania actual a cien millones de campesinos germánicos y tomar el camino hacia la dominación universal que ostentamos una vez, haciendo el mundo más bello de lo que ahora es, inspirándonos siempre en las ideas arias.

BAB NS 19/4004. Longerich, Peter: Heinrich Himmler. Biografía. (Heinrich Himmler. Biographie, 2008). Traducción de Richard Gross. RBA Libros, Barcelona 2009. Pg. 359.

SS-18 escribió:Leed esto inutiles:

Uno de los tópicos más preciados por los admiradores del III Reich es que los nacionalsocialistas, en realidad, lo que querían era liberar a los pueblos de Europa del bolchevismo, a Sudamérica del capitalismo estadounidense y al planeta en general del colonialismo. Que si cometieron “algún exceso”, fue obligado por el transcurso de la guerra y los malvados resistentes a su labor civilizadora. Pero este discurso de Himmler en una reunión con sus Gruppenführers revela otra cosmovisión, antes de que las derrotas militares y el rechazo de la Wehrmacht obligase a las Waffen SS a acoger voluntarios de toda laya.

Este discurso fue pronunciado para los más altos cargos de las SS en febrero de 1937, cuando los nazis apenas han remilitarizado el Sarre y participan más o menos disimuladamente en la guerra civil española. Faltan 13 meses para el Anschluss, 20 para los pactos de Munich, y dos años para que Hitler incumpla esos mismos pactos y disuelva lo que queda de Checoslovaquia, incumpliendo de paso también todas las garantías que había dado sobre que no aspiraba incorporar ningún territorio que no fuera “de cultura alemana”.

Reunión de jefes de grupo de la SS (rango equivalente a generales de división), en Bad Tölz, junto a la frontera austríaca, 18 de febrero de 1937 :

A veces, en círculos nacionalistas se sueña con que algún día conquistaremos el mundo. Yo también pienso así, aunque por ahora no hablemos de eso. Pero también soy consciente de que debemos actuar por etapas. Hoy día, no tendríamos los hombres suficientes para colonizar ni siquiera otra provincia, otra zona o un país que fuera sólo la mitad de grande que Alemania. Que tampoco podemos hacernos cargo de población alguna es algo que también está claro. Y de que barreremos hasta la última abuela y el último niño –sin piedad— si tenemos que hacernos cargo de una provincia que no sea de sangre germánica, de eso espero que tampoco quepa duda; ni de que entonces necesitaremos a la población, la racialmente buena, para asentarla allí, para comenzar, sin más, a reasentar y criar en torno a la Alemania actual a cien millones de campesinos germánicos y tomar el camino hacia la dominación universal que ostentamos una vez, haciendo el mundo más bello de lo que ahora es, inspirándonos siempre en las ideas arias.

BAB NS 19/4004. Longerich, Peter: Heinrich Himmler. Biografía. (Heinrich Himmler. Biographie, 2008). Traducción de Richard Gross. RBA Libros, Barcelona 2009. Pg. 359.

¿¿A que se parece a lo que dicen tus compañeros orcos de tu cueva ??? ¿ A que se parece más lo que Himmler defiende en sus palabras ? ¿ idea y invencion que tienes tu o a lo que dicen tus colegas del foro de nancys con los que no estas deacuerdo ?


Ahora leete este hilo a ver si se parece o no se parece lo que dice Himmler. [Tienes que estar registrado y conectado para ver este vínculo] comentarios sacados de tu foro de orcos.



Asi, que se llenan la bocaza de Honor , Vikingos, Magia, mistica y demás parafernalia y esta todo justificado.

Es imposible que tenga un minimo de Honor, la ideologia germanica más perturbada nunca jamás creada.

Este hilo tendría que ser considerado lectura obligatoria para todos los foreros, tanto nuevos como antiguos. Llevo varias días leyendo todo lo que encuentro en internet sobre el Plan General OST. Nunca, a nadie, he oído hacer referencia a esta masacre sistemática de la que hay pruebas documentales y físicas pero, en cambio, como todos los que estamos aquí he escuchado y leído auténticas barbaridades sobre el (supuesto) genocidio de Stalin del que todo el mundo habla, todos conocen, pero nadie puede aportar ni una sola prueba consistente por una simple razón: no puedes aportar pruebas de lo que no ha sucedido nunca.

La intención de los nazis era hacer una colonia en el territorio ruso, según Hitler la región del Este debía perder su carácter de estepa asiática y ser europeizada. Se calculaba que en unos trescientos años tendrían un parque, una especie de paraíso para la raza "superior" y, por supuesto, harían una cuidada selección de los "indígenas"

GENERALPLAN OST (GENERAL PLAN EAST)

THE NAZI REVOLUTION IN GERMAN FOREIGN POLICY

DOCUMENTARY SOURCES


The documentary record pertaining to the ideological foundations of Nazi colonization plans in the east, and the numerous versions of the GPO themselves is extensive.  The following is an annotated and limited list of relevant documents and suggested sources.
 
Comments and Pronouncements by Adolf Hitler
 
A.     1924, Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf. 8th Edition (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1939), p. 935.
 
“The foreign policy of a folkish state is charged with guaranteeing the existence on this planet of the race embraced by the State, by establishing between the number and growth of the population, on the one hand, and the size and value of the soil and territory, on the other hand, a viable, natural relationship … Only a sufficiently extensive area on this globe guarantees a nation freedom of existence.”
 
B.  1924, Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf. 8th Edition (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1939), p. 940.
 
“The National Socialist movement must endeavor to eliminate the discrepancy between our population and our area – the latter viewed not only as a source of nourishment, but also as a point of support for power politics – between our historical past and the hopelessness of our impotence today.”
 
C.  1 May 1927, Hitler quoted in the Völkischer Beobachter. See Gordon W. Prange, ed., Hitler’s Words (Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1944), pp. 19-21.
 
“As a people without power, the German people will, according to every indication, completely lose its position within the not-too-distant future.  The German people will disappear from the earth; in fact, it will perish.  This fateful question is the point of departure of our National Socialist doctrine, our Weltanschauung, and out teaching.
 
What is the relationship which the population has to the soil on which it lives?  Can the soil on which a people lives support the entire population for the time being, and is it sufficient to allow for a further increase in the population?
 
Germany is the Fatherland of 62,000,000 people who live together on an area which is 450,000 kilometers square.  This is a ridiculous figure when one considers the size of the other nations in the world today.
 
The only thing left for a people to do, then, is to attempt an adjustment in the relationship between the area on which it lives, that is its reservoir of subsistence, and its population … even if it must be done by war.  This is the natural way which Providence has prescribed.  Providence has given the world unto man, not so that he should degenerate into Pacifism, but so that in the eternal struggle with one another the strength and vigor of man should be preserved and so that some day the greatest freedom might belong to the most vigorous and most mighty people.”
 
D.  March 1928, Hitler Speech in Hamburg, Prange, Hitler’s Words, pp. 26-27.
 
“Twice in history our people has drawn the sword to advantage.  The first time, when our people colonized the south and east marches with German peasants, and second, when they, here in the north, east of the Elbe, gained the territory which has been the most precious treasure of our people.  If we had not promoted these great colonies and shed the blood which gained them, what would be the situation today?  This colonization returned a high rate of interest.  The sword of those days has become the plow of today, and even today this plow assures a great part of our people its daily bread.  If ever in the future of Germany the sword must be drawn … then it must be drawn in the service of the plow – so that some day the time will come when the sword will again become the plow.”
 
E. 16 July 1941, Hitler Comments, Conference in Führer Headquarters, in Czesław Madajczyk, ed., Generalny Plan Wschodni: Zbiór dokumentów (Warszawa: Glówna Komisja Badania Zbrodni Hitlerowskich w Polsce, 1990), pp. 61-64.
 
On Hitler’s aims in the conquered east: “The Crimea must be cleared of all [racially] foreign peoples, as must the parts of Galicia which formerly belonged to the Austrian Empire. …We must make a Garden of Eden out of the newly won eastern territories; this is important for our future existence; [overseas] colonies play a subordinate role. … All of the Baltic lands must be annexed to the Reich.  Similarly, the Crimea, with a significant adjoining region (the region north of the Crimea) must become Reich territory.  The annexed territory must be as large as possible. … The Reich must also annex the Volga Colony and the area around Baku.”
 
D. 17 October 1941, Hitler Monologue, Führer Headquarters, in Madajczyk, Generalny, pp. 69-70.
 
“The [eastern] region must lose the character of the Asiatic steppe, it must be Europeanized!  It is for this purpose that we are building great highways to the southern tip of the Crime and to the Caucasus.  German cities established along these roadways will stretch like a string of pearls, and around these will be German settlements.  The two or three million people we need [for this program] can be found quicker than we think.  We will take them from Germany, the Scandinavian lands, Western Europe, and America.  Chances are that I will not live to see this, but in twenty years twenty million people will inhabit this territory.  In three hundred years we will have a blossoming parkland of extraordinary beauty!
 
As for the people indigenous to the area, we will be sure to select those [of importance].  We will remove the destructive Jews entirely. … We will not enter Russian cities, they must die out completely.
 
There is only one task: Germanization through the introduction of Germans [to the area] and to treat the original inhabitants like Indians. … I intend to stay this course with ice-cold determination.  I feel myself to be the executor of the will of History.  What people think of me at present is all of no consequence.  Never have I heard a German who has bread to eat express concern that the ground where the grain was grown had to be conquered by the sword.  We eat Canadian wheat and never think of the Indians.”
 
Speeches and Documents: Heinrich Himmler
 
A. 1935 (no day and month given) Appendix II, Ihor Kamenetsky, Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe: A Study of Lebensraum Policies (New York: Bookman Associates, 1961), pp. 189-192. 
 
“Without end, the steppes of the Russian area extend [to] eastern Europe.  Abrupt and sudden is the difference between the cultural levels of central Europe and the gigantic districts [to the east].  And yet, on both sides of the frontier there is the same soil, but not the same people.  Only man alone is able to impress his stamp upon the country.  Therefore, on the one side the well ordered fertility, planned harmony of fields and carefully designed villages of Germany, and on the other side the zones of an impenetrable jungle, of the steppes, of never ending primeval forests, where silting rivers painfully cut their ways.
 
Badly exploited, fertile soil of black earth that could be a paradise, a California of Europe, and in reality abandoned, dreadfully neglected, branded with the stamp of a crime against culture beyond imagination even today, is a perpetual accusation against the sub-human and his rule.
 
Eastern Europe never progressed beyond a certain primitiveness.  It has never known anything but chaos because it lacked mankind, the valuable bearer of culture, the genius who systematically planned peaceful reconstruction, who ordered the well designed exploitation of the immense treasures and the fertility of the soil.  This country has only known the powers of unrestricted despoiling and brutal armament for war.
 
Highly civilized nations of central and western Europe set out with this country as their goal too.  Once there were the Goths and the Waraoger who founded empires here and brought civilization with them.  The Hanseatic League, Swedes, Flemish, Dutch, Swabian, and Saxonian settlers attempted to bring light into the darkness.  A voice crying for help was heard thence in all centuries.  Peter the Great, Catherine II, and all the others, whatever their names may be, called the German farmer and officer, the European scientist, physician, and engineer.”
 
B.  24 October 1939, Heinrich Himmler: Geheimreden 1933 bis 1945 und andere Ansprachen. Edited by B.F. Smith and A.F. Peterson (Frankfurt/Main: Propyläen Verlag, 1974), pp. 124-125.
 
“When we consider the issue [of eastern people], we first have to recognize that we have already long occupied ourselves with the Polish-Slavic problem … then we must clearly conclude, and thus have I received my tasks from the Führer, that in at least in the provinces which currently belong to Germany, the problem of the Polish minority must be solved, it must be eliminated in our lifetime.  The problem must be eliminated.
 
This is a small piece of Asia into which we have come, and we want to push the borders of Germany still farther to the east; and with that the frontiers of Europe.”
 
C.  9 June 1942, Heinrich Himmler: Geheimreden 1933 bis 1945 und andere Ansprachen. Edited by B.F. Smith and A.F. Peterson (Frankfurt/Main: Propyläen Verlag, 1974), pp. 145-161.
 
“This war makes no sense if afterwards … Bohemia and Moravia, the German eastern districts of southeast Prussia, Danzig-West Prussia, the Warthegau, Upper Silesia, the General Government, the Ostland (inc. the Baltic States and Belorussia), the Crimea, and Ingermanland aren’t completely settled with Germans within twenty years.
 
This is the task that we have set out to accomplish, for as long as we still live, once peace is established … the land is Germanized when the populace is German.”
 
Versions of the GPO
 
Mid-1940 – Himmler’s First “Generalplan” as developed in the RKFDV.  See Rolf-Dieter Mueller, Hitlers Ostkrieg und die deutsche Siedlungspolitik: Die Zusammenarbeit von Wehrmacht, Wirtschaft und SS (Frankfurt/Main: Fischer, 1991), pp. 130-138.
 
27 April 1942 – Summary by Dr. E. Wetzel of the Generalplan Ost developed in the RSHA. See Madajczyk, Generalny, pp. 82-110.  A copy of this version of the GPO does not exist.  Wetzel’s summary is the most comprehensive document on this version of the GPO that is available.
 
28 May 1942 (officially dated June 1942) – A later version of the GPO as developed in the RKFDV. 
 
29 October 1942 – Final “General Settlement Plan” from the RKFDV.  Concerns population transfers in occupied Poland and Bohemia and Moravia.  See Mechthild Roessler and Sabine Schleiermacher, eds., Der “Generalplan Ost”: Hauptlinien der nationalsozialistischen Planungs- und Vernichtungspolitik (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993), pp. 96-117.
 
Further Reading
 
Gustavo Corni and Horst Gies, “Blut und Boden”: Rassenideologie und Agrarpolitik im Staat Hitlers (Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner Verlag, 1994).  An extensive collection of documents and accompanying commentary on the development of Nazi agricultural policy based on the  notions of “blood and soil” and Germany’s need for “living space,” both of which were  central components of Nazi colonization plans in Eastern Europe.
 
Holger Herwig, “Geopolitik: Haushofer, Hitler and Lebensraum,” in The Journal of Strategic Studies (London: Frank Cass, 1999), pp. 218-241.  The best brief discussion in English of the relationship between geopolitical thinker, Dr. Karl Haushofer and Adolf Hitler.  Haushofer’s   ideas on Germany’s need for “living space” in the east dramatically influenced Hitler’s thinking on the subject, thereby making the conquest of Lebensraum a primary goal of Nazi       foreign policy.
 
Ihor Kamenetsky, Secret Nazi Plans for Eastern Europe: A Study of Lebensraum Policies (New York: Bookman Associates, 1961).  Although dated, Kamenetsky nevertheless provides an  excellent, easily understood summary of the theoretical origins of Nazi colonization plans by  exposing their basis in geopolitical and “Blood and Soil” thinking in pre-1933 Germany.
 
Robert L. Koehl, RKFDV: German Resettlement and Population Policy 1939-1945 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957).  The best English language history of the Reich Office for  the Strengthening of Germandom.
Czesław Madajczyk, ed., Generalny Plan Wschodni: Zbiór dokumentów (Warszawa: Glówna  Komisja Badania Zbrodni Hitlerowskich w Polsce, 1990).  An indispensable primary source reader containing one hundred documents relevant to the GPO and Nazi population policies, including speeches, letters, reports, and maps.
 
Rolf-Dieter Mueller, Hitlers Ostkrieg und die deutsche Siedlungspolitik: Die Zusammenarbeit    von Wehrmacht, Wirtschaft und SS (Frankfurt/Main: Fischer, 1991).  A combined monograph   and documentary collection on the connections between Nazi Germany’s war in the east and the planned exploitation of the conquered territory.  Mueller includes a section on the   complicity of the German military in developing SS plans to reshape Eastern Europe.
 
Frank Parrella, “Lebensraum and Manifest Destiny: A Comparative Study in the Justification of  Expansionism” (MA Thesis: Georgetown University, 1950).  An adequate comparative  treatment of the similarities and contrasts between the Lebensraum-based foreign policy of     Nazi Germany and the American policy of Manifest Destiny. Relies too heavily on published  secondary sources.
 
Henry Picker, Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier 1941-42 (Bonn: Athenäum     Verlag, 1951).  A valuable collection of secret conversations recorded in Hitler’s    headquarters, during which the Nazi leader spoke about a wide variety of subjects, including German foreign policy, the war against the USSR, and Germanization efforts in Eastern  Europe.
 
Gordon W. Prange, ed., Hitler’s Words (Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1944).  An excellent compilation of quotes and comments from Hitler as printed in the  German press during the 1920s and 30s.  Prange makes it clear that Hitler did not hide his foreign policy plans and intentions from anyone, least of all the German people.
 
Mechthild Roessler and Sabine Schleiermacher, eds., Der “Generalplan Ost”: Hauptlinien der nationalsozialistischen Planungs und Vernichtungspolitik (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993). A Collection of articles on various aspects of the Generalplan Ost, including its genocidal dimensions.  Contains good essays from Karl Heinz Roth and Czesław Madajczyk.
 
Bradley F. Smith and Agnes F. Peterson, eds., Heinrich Himmler Geheimreden 1933 bis 1945  und andere Ansprachen (Frankfurt/Main: Propyläen Verlag, 1974). An important collection   of several secret speeches by the Reich Leader SS Heinrich Himmler before and during the Second World War.
 
Bruno Wasser, Himmlers Raumplanung im Osten: Der Generalplan Ost in Polen 1940-1944  (Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1993).  The most detailed study of the GPO and other Nazi  resettlement plans as implemented in occupied Poland.

GERMAN PLANS TO ATTACK THE SOVIET UNION IN 1940
HITLER'S SECRET MILITARY SUMMIT CONFERENCES AT THE BERGHOF, JULY 1940

As documented in the World Future Fund Report, General Plan East: The Nazi Revolution in German Foreign Policy,  the foundation of Hitler's geopolitical plans was the conquest of the European part of the Soviet Union.  Hitler had hoped that he could reach a nonaggression pact with England before the war and launch this campaign in conjunction with a Japanese invasion of Russia from the east.

In 1938 and 1939 British and French opposition to German plans for expansion in eastern Europe led to a situation in early 1939 where Germany was facing an ultimatum from Britain not to invade Poland.  Hitler had absolutely no interest in attacking France or England, but the March 1939 agreement between England and Poland forced Hitler to totally reverse course and reach an agreement with Stalin concerning a division of Poland, similar to the agreement reached between Frederick the Great and Catherine the Great in the late 18th century.

Hitler had hoped that this would intimidate England and France and make them willing to accept a German conquest of western Poland.  He was dead wrong, and in September 1939 England and France declared war on Germany, turning a territorial dispute between Germany and Poland into a world war.  Ironically, England and France did not declare war on the other partner in the conquest of Poland, the Soviet Union.  England and France also violated their solemn assurances to the Poles that any German attack on them would immediately lead to a French invasion of Germany.  As a result, Hitler was able to concentrate almost all German forces in the east and crush the Poles while Britain and France sat behind their defenses in the west and sent no aid to the Polish forces.

The pathetic collapse of the numerically superior Anglo-French military forces in May 1940 and the fall of France caused Hitler to again turn his attention to his primary goal.  It is an example of the depth of geopolitical obsession with conquering Russia that even without reaching a peace agreement with England (now being backed by America) he began active planning for an eastern invasion..

He still kept his options open but after the failure of discussions with Molotov in Berlin in November 1940 he gave specific orders to set in motion his original master plan.  The following material documents Hitler's comments in secret discussions in the summer of 1940.  )Unless other wise noted, these quotations were taken from Walter Warlimont, Inside Hitler's Headquarters, 1939-1945.  Tr. R.H. Barry, Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1991)


Military Planning Conference at the Berghof, 29 July 1940
 Military Planning Conference at the Berghof, 31 July 1940
Additional Evidence

Military Planning Conference at the Berghof, 29 July 1940

These comments were made during an informal meeting of German military officers in the Special Command Train Atlas at the Bad Reichenall Station following the conference at the Berghof.  These comments were made by General Alfred Jodl, the Chief of the Armed Forces Command Staff (Wehrmachtsführungsamt) in Armed Forces High Command - OKW.  The comments were recorded by Jodl's subordinate, Colonel Walter Warlimont.

"[Including myself] Four of us (Lt. Col. von Lossberg, Capt. Junge, Major Freiherr von Falkenstein) were present, sitting at individual tables in the restaurant car. ... Jodl went round ensuring that all doors and windows were closed and then, without any preamble, [he] disclosed to us that Hitler had decided to rid the world 'once and for all' of the danger of Bolshevism by a surprise attack on Soviet Russia to be carried out at the earliest possible moment, i.e. in May 1941.

... Jodl countered every question [we had] ... although he convinced none of us. ... He repeated Hitler's view and probably his own also that the collision with Bolshevism was bound to come and that it was better therefore to have this campaign now, when we were at the height of our military power, than to have to call the German people to arms once more in the years to come.

... Shortly after Jodl's disclosure, we happened to discover that Hitler had originally been determined to launch the attack in the late summer of 1940.  The most urgent representations from Keitel and Jodl ... had been necessary to convince the Supreme Commander that the time and space factors alone, together with the weather conditions, rendered this plan totally impracticable."

Source: Warlimont, Inside, pp. 111-112

Military Planning Conference at the Berghof, 31 July 1940

This meeting included Hitler, the Chiefs of Armed Forces High Command (OKW), Army High Command (OKH), and Navy High Command.  These notes are from the war diary of General Franz Halder, the Chief of Staff in OKH:

"[According to Hitler] Britain's hope lies in Russia and the United States.  If Russia drops out of the picture America, too, is lost for Britain, because elimination of Russia would tremendously increase Japan's power in the Far East.  Russia is the Far Eastern sword of Britain and the United States pointed at Japan. ... Russia is the factor upon which Britain is relying most.  Something must have happened in London! (i.e., a reference to Britain's pre-war anti-communist stance being reversed) ... With Russia smashed, Britain's last hope would be shattered.  Germany will then be master of Europe and the Balkans.  Decision: Russia's destruction must therefore be made a part of this struggle.  Spring 1941.  The sooner Russia is crushed, the better.  Attack achieves its purpose only if Russian state can be shattered to its roots with one blow.  Holding part of the country will not do.  Standing still for the following winter would be perilous ... Resolute determination to eliminate Russia."

Source: Halder, Diaries, pp. 533-4 (31 July 1940) 

Conversations and Military Planning Conferences in 1940 during which Hitler Stated His Intention to Attack the USSR:

"In another conversation with Field-Marshal von Rundstedt on 2 June 1940 recorded by the l; General von Sodenstern who was present, Hitler said that now that he imagined England was ready for peace, he would begin to settle the account with Bolshevism.

Entries in [General] Halder's diary:

3 July 1940.  (Recording a conversation with the head of his Operations Section)  The most pressing problems at the moment are England and  ... the East.  As regards the latter, the main question is how to deal Russia a military blow which will force her to recognize Germany's preponderant role in Europe.'

13 July 1940.  (After a conversation with Hitler)  The question in the forefront of the Führer's mind is why England is still unwilling to make peace; like us, he thinks that the answer is that England still has some hope of action on the part of Russia.

22 July 1940.  (Recording a conversation with the Commander-in-Chief of the Army [Brauchitsch])  The latter appears to have summed up his impressions of a discussion he had had with Hitler the previous day by the following instruction: 'The problem of Russia must be dealt with.  We must begin thinking about this.'

30 July 1940.  (An extract from an appreciation of the situation worked out with the Commander-in-Chief of the Army [Brauchitsch])  If we cannot reach a decision against England, the danger remains that England will ally herself with Russia; the question then is whether we should carry on a war on two fronts, one of which would be Russia.  Answer: Better remain friends with Russia.

31 July 1940.  (Some of Hitler's statements in the Berghof)  ... Russia must be dealt with.  Spring 1941. ... Destruction of the power of Russia.  To be achieved by:

1. A thrust towards Kiev with flank on the Dnieper.

2. Thrust through the Baltic States in direction Moscow. Finally, pincer operation from north and south.  Later a separate operation against the Baku oil fields.  We can then see the extent to which Finland and Turkey are involved."
Source: Warlimont, Inside, pp. 112-113, 135.

Additional Evidence

Excerpt from Orders Given by General Alfred Jodl to the OKW Planning Section Concerning the Attack on the USSR, 5 December 1940:+

"The Führer is determined to carry through this operation in the east since the Army will never again be as strong as it is at this moment and Soviet Russia has recently given one more proof that she will always, whenever possible, stand in Germany's path."

Source: Warlimont, Inside, p.137.

Evidence that Plans for a German Attack on the Soviet Union existed before Hitler's Formal Instructions in Late July 1940:
"General Jodl ... during cross-examination in Nuremberg in 1946, stated: 'I was not the first who made preparations for an attack on the Soviet Union.  To my surprise I discovered here [at Nuremberg], through the witness Paulus, that long before we [i.e., Wehrmacht High Command - OKW] concerned ourselves with any orders of this kind, plans of attack were already worked out in the General Staff of the Army [i.e., Army High Command - OKH]'"

Source: Warlimont, Inside, p.137.

HITLER'S MASTER PLAN FOR EXPANSION

CZESLAW MADAJCZYK

Polish Western Affairs 1962, Vol. III No 2

The term Generalplan Ost first appears in two documents of the Ministry for the occupied Eastern Territories. (Reichsministerium für die besetzten Ostgebiete), prepared by Wetzel, an employee in the Racial Policy Office of the N.S.D.A.P.1, who from 1941 simultaneously held an important post in the Political Department of Rosenberg´s ministry. The first document is Wetzel´s minute of the session on questions of the Germanization of the Soviet Baltic republics, held on February 4th , at Dr. Kleist´s2.

This minute refers to S.S.-Obersturmbannführer Gummitsch (representative of S.S.Standartenführer Ehlich3) as taking part on behalf of the Security Office of the Reich (R.S.H.A.), on account of his association with the institution from which the Generalplan Ost (hereafter referred to as GPO) by Wetzel, dated April 27th, 1942. It bears the title Stellungnahme und Gedanken zum Generalplan Ost des Reichsführers S.S., and has already been published in several historical periodicals4.

Judging from the provenance of the document and its contents, we may be justified in assuming that it was intended for Rosenberg´s use. The skepticism evident in it regarding the actuality of a number of steps proposed by the R.S.H.A. indicates the atmosphere of antagonism that existed between Himmler and Rosenberg at that time regarding their scope of competence in the occupied Soviet territories. Wetzel writes that in November 1941 he had already known that the R.S.H.A., then enjoying the strongest position in the Reich and - in the opinion of the institutions under Himmler - also operating as a Commissariat for Germanization, was worked on a general plan for the eastern territories. A competent employee of that office, Ehlich (mentioned earlier), had then given him the figure of 31 million "aliens" destined for deportation.

Certain elements of the Generalplan Ost elaborated by the R.S.H.A. can be singled out in Wetzel´s appraisal, because he often takes them as a starting point for his counter-arguments. He quotes the following estimate of the number of future settlers provided for in the GPO:

1. immediate resettlement


110,000 persons ready to settle with their wives 220,000
peasant families in resettlers´camps 20,000
families of German origin in Russia - 4 children each 600,000
total 840,000


2. later resettlement


peasant families 880,000
further resettlers 30,000
Volksdeutsche from overseas (3 children each) 200,000
total 1,110,000


3. further resettlement


during the first 10 years 45-50,000 families 200,000
during the next 20 years, 20-30,000 families annually 2,400,000
2,600,000
total during 30 years 4,550,000



Together with settlers from other Gernanic countries and Volksdeutsche, the authors of the GPO expected to have 10 million persons for the colonization of the eastern territories. These territories included the occupied Polish lands, the Soviet Baltic republics (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia), the "West Ukraine" (the provinces of Zhitomir and Kamieniec Podolski, part of Vinnitsa) and areas assigned for settlement: the Leningrad region (Ingermanland), the Crimea and hinterland and the bend of the Dnieper (Dnieprbogen). These territories were populated by about 45 million "aliens" including 5-6 million Jews5. For racial reasons, the authors of the GPO planned to deport 31 million of these people to western Siberia. On the other hand, one may accept the hypothesis that the remaining 14 million people were to be annihilated, or considered suitable for Germanization and left where they were, or else used as manpower to work in the Reich or in the annexed territories.

Wetzel also writes that the GPO gave the percentage of Polish and Byelorussian population and that of the "West Ukraine" and the Baltic countries that was to be deported to West Siberia in the course of thirty years. Wetzel, who opposed the resettlement of the population from the Baltic republics, made an exception here and did not quote the percentage. Of the Polish population 80-85% was to be deported, i.e., from 16 to 20l4 million;65% of the population was to be deported from the "West Ukraine" and 75% from Byelorussia.

The first information of the provisions of the GPO was probably not that (previously mentioned) given by Ehlich to Wetzel in 1941. Much goes to show that were first mentioned in a speech made by Heydrich, head of the RSHA, in Prague6 on October 2nd , 1941, just after he had taken up the post of Protector of Bohemia and Moravia, where he presented the plans for the future of the Czech nation according to the general principles for the Bohemia. These principles are worthy of close attention. True, the name GPO did not figure in Heydrich´s speech, but the outline of expansion to the east in stages is in striking agreement with many of the elements contained in Wetzel´s appraisal. Polish territory, the Baltic republics and the Ukraine, towards which Heydrich did not clearly define the intentions of the Third Reich, were to fall within it range.

In May 1942, Himmler received a memorandum from Professor Konrad Meyer-Hetling, headed Generalplan Ost, Rechtliche, wirtschaftliche und räumliche Grundlagen des Ostaufbaues, which we shall print below. Only the six-page summary of this memorandum under the title Kurze Zusammenfassung der Denkschrift Generalplan Ost - rechtliche, wirtschaftliche und räumliche Grundlagen des Ostaufbaues, among the documents of the Nuremberg Trial (No 2225), was known until recently. It was thought, that the memorandum itself had been lost.

The first information of its content was given by Robert L. Koehl in RKFDV: German Resettlement and Population Policy 1939-1945, published by the Harvard University Press in 1957. Further references to it existence were made in 1960 in the West Germany quarterly "Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte"7. The memorandum and its summary were enclosures in the letter sent by SS-Oberführer Professor Meyer-Hetling on May 28th, 1942 to Himmler, Reichsführer SS and Commissary for Germanization.

As early as the spring of 1940, Professor Meyer-Hetling was Head of the SS planning office for the Polish territories incorporated into the Reich8. From the following year, he was head of the planning office of the Commissariat for Germanization, the Stabshauptamt, and of the Central Land Office (Zentralbodenamt). He was also Director of the Institute for Agrarian Affairs and Agrarian Policy (Institut für Agrarwesen und Agrarpolitik) at the Berlin University. It was at this university that the published document was prepared. Dr. J. Boesler cooperated in financial questions. Perhaps it was coincidence that in the summer of 1942, that is, shortly after the preparation of the memorandum and it favourable reception by Himmler, Professor Meyer-Hetling was given further powers in the field of planning resettlement. He took up the post of Beauftragter für die Siedlung und Landesraumordnung beim Reichsleiter für Agrarpolitik in the Ministry of Food and Agriculture and of Bauernführer of the Reich. He was also appointed Head of the Committee for Resettlement in the occupied eastern territories9.

It follows from Professor Meyer-Hetling´s previously mentioned letter of May 28th that the published memorandum was prepared in connection with instructions received on July 115th, 1941, and Meyer´s report of January 27th, 194210. Here is some information concerning these dates.

In the spring of 1941, Meyer-Hetling was entrusted with the preparation of a memorandum on planning resettlement and on development planning in the Polish territories "incorporated into the Reich"11. For this purpose he made use of the results of research carried out by the Technical College in Berlin12.

He made the results of this research known in a paper he read on July 15th, 1941, and at the opening of an Exhibition Planung und Aufbau im Osten on October 23rd13. Himmler expressed his appreciation of Professor Meyer-Hetling´s elaboration, which included exemplary model villages and farms.

On January 27th, 1942, the SS Reichsführer received Professor Meyer and entrusted him with the further task of elaborating the legal, economic and political foundations for the "further reconstruction of the East", also including the Crimea and the Leningrad region. It follows from the evidence given by Meyer at the VIII Nuremberg Trial that the Generalplan Ost elaborated by him had been based on suggestions made by Himmler and the head of the Stabshauptamt Greifelt during conversations.

In his letter of May 28th, 1942, to Himmler, Meyer wrote that the Generalplan Ost which he had submitted as well as the directives to this plan and the recommendations of the Reichsführer had called for further research on basic questions, the result of which he was presenting for consideration. In the published memorandum, he recalls that the Generalplan Ost of July 15th, 1941, envisaged the assignment of new areas for resettlement, taking into account the development prospects over a period of 30 years. As can be seen, the term Generalplan Ost is used by Meyer with many meanings. In the letter he uses it rather in the same sense as he did during the VIII Nuremberg Trial. In this sense, it was a plan for resettlement solely of the Polish territories "incorporated into the Reich". In the published document part B. with several tables and graphs, constitutes the continuation of the elaboration of the plan. It deals almost exclusively with calculations of the cost of the resettlement campaign and the sources from which these costs might be covered in the Polish territories "incorporated into the Reich". Detailed considerations is given to the measures essential for the rapid Germanization of these territories, and for the completion of resettlement in the rural areas within five years after the end of the war and in town within ten years. The cheapness of labor is striking in the financial calculations. This results from the planned use of prisoners-of-war and the inmates of prisons as man power.

Parts A and C, on the other hand, have the character of a long-term plan, of long-term imperialist expansion, ranging over further Polish territories and Soviet areas under German occupation. As compared with the summary already known to us, it does not introduce any new factors in the basic principles. What is new is the detailed elaboration of these principles. The maximum of control was to be guaranteed to the SS in the colonized territories, by a planned system of ownership and jurisdiction based on the feudal pattern (Zeitlehen - 7 years, Erblehen - 20 years, Leheneigentum, Lehensgericht, Oberlehensgericht), and a State monopoly of land, both in the towns and in the rural areas. They were to cover an area the size of 1-2 districts in the Reich (about 2,000 sq. Km) and to relocated at distances of about 100 km along two communication routes. One was to lead from the Reich in the direction of the Leningrad region (Königsberg-Leningrad, Wilno-Leningrad) and the other, also from the Reich, in the direction of the Crimea (Warsaw-Lublin-Rowne or Cracow-Lwow-Rowyne and then Biala Cerkiew-Krivoi Rog-Nikokajew). A plan was hurriedly prepared for building a motor road from the Reich to the Crimea. Fourteen bases were to be set up in the General Gouvernement, in the Zamosc region among others, 8 in the Ukraine and 14 in the so called Ostland14. Also note worthy is the intention of reducing the population of the towns. In the Leningrad region the population of the towns was to decrease from the pre-war figure of 3,200,000 to 200,000 and in the Crimea, from 790,000 to 680,000. And lastly, a rather curious thing, Professor Meyer-Hetling included 80,000 Polish mountaineers in the reserve population for resettlement.

The question arises as to the relation of the document published below to the GPO, the subject of E. Wetzel´s elaboration (Stellungnahme und Gedanken zum Generalplan Ost des Reichsführers SS). The Generalplan Ost of the Central Security Office of the Reich most probably concentrated on the population policy, and on ways and methods of deportation or annihilation of certain European peoples. In these genocidal plans, the questions of deportation, the extent of Germanization among the people woh were to be deported and the resettlement of Germanic peoples were dominant15. In Professor Meyer-Hetling´s GPO, the legal and economic aspects of the Nazi colonization of the occupied Polish and Soviet territories were brought to the fore. Nevertheless, the GPO elaborated by the Central Security Office of the Reich contained estimates of the reserves of population needed for resettlement and a fairly precise determination of the territories assigned for colonization. In the estimate of the population reserves for the purpose of German resettlement in the east, the RSHA gave a figure known to us from Hitler´s statement in the Chief Headquarters on October 18th, 194116.

In this situation, Himmler´s instructions to Professor Meyer-Hetling to make further estimates seems to indicate that the SS leader and commissary for Germanization was interested in developing the basic provisions and in checking up on the calculations of the RSHA by an institution outside it apparatus - the Institute of the Berlin University. The hypothesis may be advanced that the Generalplan Ost was a plan prepared by the RSHA, constituting a further development of the plan for the treatment of the conquered territories of the Soviet Union revealed by Hitler on July 16th, 1941 in the General Headquarters17, while, Meyer-Hetling´s GPO was partly an analytical checking of the principles of that plan and partly a development of those principles.

Himmler took action very quickly on receiving Meyer´s memorandum and sent his opinion to Greifelt, the Head of the Stabshauptamt, on June 12th. The general commander of the SS and police expressed his approval of Meyer´s plan. He intended to present it to Hitler at an appropriate moment, but considered it essential first to link it up into one whole (Gesamtsiedlungsplan) with earlier plans prepared for the various Polish territories "incorporated into the Reich", for Bohemia and Moravia, for Alsace-Loraine and also for Upper Austria and Lower Styria18. In addition, Himmler demanded that the estimates for the settlers, workmen and financial means, which Meyer had drawn up solely for the Polish territories "incorporated into the Reich", should be extended to cover all the territories included in the GPO, and that the Generalsiedlungsplan prepared on the model of the Generalplan Ost; at the same time he demanded that the period of realization should be shortened from 25-30 years to 20 years. On the other hand, the range of Germanization in the eastern territories as envisaged by Meyer, particularly the limitation of the resettlement campaign in the General Gouvernment and Ostland to restricted bases, met with Himmler´s disapproval. He demanded that the GPO should provide for the complete Germanization of Esthonia, Latvia and the General Government within 20 years. Lithuania was to be colonized.



References to Meyer´s memorandum can be found in Himmler´s speech to the leaders of the SS and the police at Zhitomir in the southern Russian sector on September 16th, 194219. He then gave an assurance to his subordinates that the Reich would be victorious in the following year and announced - as in his correspondence with Meyer - that all the Polish territories would be colonized and that the Soviet Baltic countries and Byelorussia (Ostland), the Crimea and the Leningrad region would be Germanized and colonized. Himmler made another announcement of something new in his speech, namely, that resettlement bases (as proposed in the document published by Meyer on the General Gouvernment and part of the occupied Soviet territories) were to be established in the eastern areas as far as the Don and Volga and even perhaps as the Urals.

On January 12th, 1943, Himmler sent a letter direct to Meyer concerning the eastern plan20. In this letter, the chief of the SS expressed his opinion on the table of basic figures (Grundzahlen) and the maps prepared by Meyer for the Generalsiedlungsplan21 which had been sent to him by Greifelt on December 23rd, 1942. In turn, he demanded that, besides Lithuania, Latvia, Esthonia, the Leningrad region, the Crimea and the Chersonese, resettlement in the east should also include Byelorussia. The GPO was to be amended also these lines without delay. Copies of the letter of December 23rd, 1942, to Meyer were sent to SS-Obergruppenführer Wolff, chief of the SS personal staff, to SS-Gruppenführer Berger, head of the Chief Command Office of the SS, who from 1942 also carried out the function of liaison officer between the Ministry for the East and the institutions under the Reichsführer SS, and to the chief of the police and the security service.

Meyer-Hetling answered the letter of the Chief of the SS22 after a month (February 15th), giving an assurance that he was prepared the basic materials for the Generalsiedlungsplan and enclosing some tables, which have not so far been found. In the face of the declaration of total war after the defeat at Stalingrad, Meyer-Hetling asked, without any great enthusiasm, if he was to continue to elaborate basic materials for the Generalsiedlungsplan. According to information given in the "Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte", it was only in April that Himmler gave a rather evasive reply23. It is probable that planning of the colonization in the east was soon abandoned, for Hitler, in connection with the declaration of total war, suspended all further planning until peacetime.

One sometimes meets with the opinion that the GPO was only fantasy, an extravagance, a utopia that brought no practical consequences24. This view should be confronted with the already known facts and measures taken by the authorities of the Third Reich, particularly Himmler and his apparatus, which in the years 1941/42 gained an unquestionably key position in the eastern policy. The moves made to facilitate the realization of the GPO and all the initial measures for it realization are also important. The period of military successes in the east was too short to achieve anything more.

The period of work on the GPO coincided with the greatest intensification of Nazi crimes in the east. This applies, above all, to the mass "liquidation" of millions of Soviet prisoners-of-war and Jews. The data contained in the version of the GPO available to Wetzel had become obsolete. According to these data, 45 million persons were living in the territories assigned for colonization, including 5-6 million Jews. A large percentage of this population perished; the losses in Poland reached six million and in the territory of the USSR over 20 million, including about seven million civilians. Moreover, at least one and a half million Polish civilians and prisoners-of-war ware taken to the Reich for forced labor. And the Nazis intended to act even more ruthlessly after achieving victory. In November 1941, that is at the time when Hitler and his close associates considered that the result of the war was already decided, Göring gave some indications of this in a conversation with Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister. During this conversation the question of the famine threatened Greece war raised. Göring advised Ciano not to worry about this too much, just as he was not worrying about the fact that the Soviet prisoners-of-war were dying of hunger. "This year, 20 to 30 million people will die of hunger in Russia. Perhaps it is a good thing that this is happening, because certain peoples must be decimated"25. It should also be borne in mind that the colonization of the annexed Polish territories and the Germanization of Silesia and Pomerania, by means of the general or very large-scale imposition of citizenship of the Third Reich upon Poles, were far advanced and progressing at a terrific pace, but the results were superficial and miscarried. In the Poznan and Lodz regions there were two chief resettlement staff headquarters and 17 district resettlement staff headquarters operating in August 1942. Pomerania, Silesia and the Polish lands incorporated into East Prussia had each one chief resettlement staff headquarters, with a total of 34 district staff headquarters (Pomerania 18, Silesia 7, East Prussia 9). Altogether, they deported about one million Polish citizens, at the same time resettling about three quarters of a million Germans from the Reich and Volksdeutsche of various kinds At Riga, there was a chief resettlement staff headquarters for the Soviet Baltic republic; a resettlement staff headquarter was also set up at Kowno as well as ten district statt headquarters. A resettlement staff headquarters was also set up in Prague.26

In January 1942, Himmler came forward with the project of creating an area of German resettlement under his auspices in the south-western part of the occupied Lithuanian Republic, to which the Lithuanian Volksdeutsche who hat not yet been resettled were to return. As is known, "West Lithuania" was an area assigned for colonization in the plan evaluated by Wetzel. True, up to December 1942, Rosenberg was opposed to Himmler´s project; nevertheless, by autumn 1942, the SS authorities had expropriated 6,597 farms in Lithuania and had resettled on farms 16,786 persons27 who had been repatriated to the Reich in the years 1939/40. In March, 1942, while in Cracow, Himmler set himself the aim of starting the colonization of the Polish territories included in the General Gouvenment, territories which Hitler, in a conversation with Governor Frank in March 1941, had destined for Germanization within 15 to 20 years28. The head of SS and police designated the south-eastern part of the Lublin province, known as the Zamosc region, as the first area for colonization. Over 100,000 Poles were expelled from the Zamosc region between November 1942 and July 194329. A little earlier, in the second half of 1942, it was decided to create a resettlement area in the Zhitomir-Vinnitsa area which was to receive Volksdeutsche from the Ukrainie, who were threatened by the partisans. At this time steps were also made taken to prepare the Crimea to receive Germans repatriated from Italian Tyrol and Palestine after the war30. Among others, the SS-Krimkommando was set up.

Finally, preparations were being made for the resettlement in the east of people from Holland and undesirable population from Alsace-Lorraine, Luxembourg and Slovenia.

These were preliminary steps towards colonization in the east, sometimes intended to sound the reaction of the population of some particular territory. These measures included the deportation of "aliens", the settlement of Germanic population and the concentration of Volksdeutsche in the occupied eastern territories. It is a striking fact that all the territories where these attempts at various kinds of colonization ware made were those included in the territorial range of the GPO elaborated by the RSAH.

And yet another argument. The year 1942 spelled failure for the Nazi leaders who did not prove ruthless enough in realizing the expansionist aims of National Socialism. Governor Frank suffered a defeat in the disputes on the extent of competence of the SS and police in the General Gouvernment; his suggestion that the Germanization of this area should be started after the war was rejected in 1942. A. Dallin, in his German Rule in Russia 1941-1945, pointed out how quickly the proposals for the dismemberment of the USSR put forward by Rosenberg, the minister for the occupied eastern territories, were quashed and how powerful was the position of the head of the SS, and police in the occupied territories of the USSR. Earlier in autumn 1941, the cautious Neurath had been replaced by none other than Heydrich, head of the Chief Security Office of the Reich, who became head of the Bohemian Protectorate.

This, and the fact that Himmler, in preparing the GPO, was realizing Hitler´s directives and suggestions to treat the east as Lebensraum (which Hitler expressed clearly in conversations known to have taken place at the General Headquarters)31, show all the more clearly that the threat of these criminal projects being put into practice in the east was a very serious one. This threat could only be averted by a Nazi defeat; and paradoxically, the armies of the nations whose population was to be sent to distant Siberia entered Berlin in 1945.

We received the microfilm of this document from the Microfilm Copies of Miscellaneous German Records Collection (Part II), National Archives Microcopies No. T - 84 (Part II), roll 73, item E.A.P. 66-c-12-2/20.

We are publishing the whole text, leaving the conventional abbreviations: ca (circa), evtl. (eventuell), z.Z. (zur Zeit), z.B. (zum Beispiel), verg or vgl. (Vergleiche), d.h. (das heisst), usw (und so weiter), S. (Seite), We have also left the original notes marked on the document.

NOTES

1 In October 1939, this Nazi expert on racial questions prepared a menorandum jointly with Dr. Hecht on the treatment of the Polish population.

2 On March 11th, 1942, this protocol was received by Dr. Otto Bräutigam, head of the Eastern Political Department. Kleist was head of the Ostland Section in the same Political Department.

3 Dr. Hans Ehlich was head of the III B group (questions of re-Germanization, questions of ethical groups in south-eastern territories, population policy, etc.).

4 "Przeglad Zachodni" No 2/1958, "Voienno istoricheskiy Journal" No 1/1960, "Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte" No 3/1958.

5 Wetzel estimated this population at 65 million, but he probably did not allow for those who had been evacuated into the interior of the USSR.

6 In the documentary publications Die Vergangenheit warnt, Prague, 1960, p. 126

7 Nachtrag zu der Dokumentation "Generalplan Ost", Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, No 1/1960

8 As early as January 24th, 1940, during a meeting with Koppe, the chief of the SS and police in Poznan, he made a speech to those engaged in planning German colonization in the annexed Polish territories (National Archives Microcopy No T-81, roll No 296 k. 2421159/2421160). The activity of Meyer-Hetling as chief of planning in Poznan was referred to by his collaborator von Machui in the book Die Hintergründe des Falles Oberländer written under pseudonym of Victor Silling (pp. 45-51), published in 1960.

9 Buchheim; Rechtsstellung und Organisation des Reichskommissars für die Festigung deutschen Volkstums. The collective work, Gutachten des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte, München 1958.

10 Nuernberg, Trial, No VIII, vol. 8, stenogram of evidence given by Professor Meyer Hetling.

11 In October 1939, the Nazi Reich annexed Gdansk, Pomerania, the Poznan region, most of the province of Lodz, Upper Silesia, the Dabrowa Basin, the western part of the provinces of Crakow, the Ciechanow and Suwalki regions ("territories incorporated into the Reich"). These territories had nearly ten million inhabitants, are formed into the General Gouvernment by Nazi authorities. The head of the occupied authorities in the GG was Dr. Hans Frank.

12 See the remarks of Helmut Heiber to the documentation on the Generalplan Ost, "Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte" No 3/1958

13 The materials shown at this exhibition included the publication Planung und Aufbau im Osten (Erläuterungen und Skizzen zum ländlichen Aufbau in den neuen Ostgebieten) prepared by the Stabshauptamt Planning Department and edited by K. Meyer, author of the introduction. It appeared in Berlin in 1942.

14 "Ostland" included the Byelorussian Republic and the Soviet Baltic republics.

15 The population to be resettled did not include only Germans and Volksdeutsche, but also other nationalities of Germanic origin.

16 Bericht No 45 of 18 Oct. 1941, photocopy, Archives of the Chief Commission for the Investigation of Nazi Crimes, Warsaw.

17 Hitler then forecast the incorporation into the Reich of the Soviet Baltic republics, the Crimea, Galicia, the Kola Peninsula, Baku and the region of Saratov, and the Polish Bialystok region.

18 The author does not know if all the plans mentioned have survived. The following plans are known to him: For the annexed Polish lands Himmler issued the Richtlinine für die Planung und Gestaltung der Städte in den eingegliederten deutschen Ostgebieten (Allgemeine Anordnung No. 13/II of 30. Jan. 1942) and Grundsätze und Richtlinien für denländlichen Aufbau in den neuen Ostgebieten (Neues Bauerntum - Sonderdruck, I/1941). In addition there was the Generalsiedlungsplan, mentioned by the chief of the SS and police in the Poznan region, SS-Gruppenführer Koppe (National Archives, Microcopy No T 81, roll No 296 k. 2421150-54). For Lorraine the governor, Bürckel, issued on 14. Oct. 1941 Grundsätze und Richtlinien für die ländliche Siedlungsplanung in Lothringen (Ibid, Microcopy No T 81, roll No 314, k. 2444383-244408). A Generalsiedlungsplan was also prepared for the annexed northern Slovenia (Lower Styria). The author does not know this general plan, but only the Anlage zu dem Generalsiedlungsplan der Grenzsiedlungszone der Untersteiermark of 11. Jan. 1942 and Entwurf zum Generalsiedlungsplan der Grenzsiedlungszone der Untersteiermark (Ibid, Microcopy No T 81, roll No 284 k. 2406980 and 2407023-55). The plans referring to Bohemia are to be found in the previously-mentioned publication Die Vergangenheit warnt.

19 XI Nuernberg Trial, No 2668. Note on speech

20 VIII Nuernberg Trial, No 2245, confidential letter of Himmler´s personal staff, sent direct to Meyer, as Greifelt had been given a long period of leave.

21 Ibid, confidential note.

22 VIII Nuernberg Trial, No 2255, confidential letter which came to Himmlers personal staff on Feburary 18th. It contradicts the evidence given by Meyer-Hetling in this trial on the cessation of this work in Janurary.

23 No 1/1960

24 This view is found in the VIII Nuernberg Trial, and also in Heiber´s introduction to the documentation on the GPO in the previously-mentioned "Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte".

25 Les Archives Secrètes du Comte Ciano 1936-42, p. 478

26 Buchheim, op. Cit. Pp. 250-251

27 National Archives, Microcopy No T 81, roll 291, Bericht über die sieben monatliche Tätigkeit vom 1. IV.-31. X. 42. Considerably more Volksdeutsche returned to Lithuania than were previously settled there, viz. 28,000.

28 Frank´s Tagebuch, 1941, I, 146-149 and Frank´s Regierungssitzungen 1941. III-X, 4-7

29 A description of these deportations is contained in C. Madajczyk´s article Deportations in the Zamossc Region in 1942 and 1943 in the Light of German Documents, "Acta Poloniae Historica", vol. I, Warszawa 1958.

30 At the beginning of 1942, Hitler had decided to start deporting Russians and Ukrainians from the Crimea and to settle

31 H. Picker, Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier 1941-42

Psíquicas
La raza negra tiene un promedio de 85 en coeficiente intelectual. Esto se debe, entre otras cosas, a su volumen cerebral y capacidad craneal.
Como consecuencia de la testosterona, es también una raza agresiva e impulsiva, pero conformista. No ha habido revoluciones importantes protagonizadas por negros.
Es una raza apegada a la música, especialmente de sonidos repetitivos, al ocio y a las posesiones materiales

Supremacismo
El supremacismo es la creencia, teoría o doctrina que afirma que un grupo determinado es superior a otro.
Existen diversas clases de supremacismo en cuanto a su naturaleza, entre los que destacan los raciales, los religiosos y los de género como el machismo y el feminismo.
Se observan también dos tipos de supremacismo en cuanto a su grado:
Supremacismo radical. Al que se adhieren aquellos grupos que creen que deben tener el control en todos los órdenes, es decir intervenir e imponer sus propios intereses sobre los intereses ajenos. Este prejuicio ha motivado a la persecusión, esclavización o exterminio de uno o más grupos considerados "inferiores".
Supremacismo indiferente o moderado. Algunos supremacistas creen que sus valores son superiores, pero ello no implica necesariamente un odio o desprecio a los demás y consideran inútil o inmoral intervenir e imponerse sobre los intereses ajenos. Quienes adoptan este tipo de supremacismo, consideran que es más bien una estrategia social para exaltar sus propios valores ante sus miembros y así motivarlos a la superación y la competencia. Suelen ejemplificarlo o compararlo con los equipos deportivos, en los que se observa este tipo de supremacismo y que es socialmente tolerado.
No todas las manifestaciones supremacistas son equivalentes ni se rigen sobre los mismos principios. El supremacismo negro, por ejemplo, se basa en un resentimiento contra los pueblos que cree fueron culpables de la explotación de los africanos, principalmente de raza blanca, aunque como expone el Dr. David Duke en su libro Supremacismo Judío, la explotación de negros fue en mayor medida realizada por judíos. No obstante, también existen manifestaciones supremacistas negras que sólo se limitan a la exaltación de la raza negra sin llegar al odio o desprecio de otras razas. El supremacismo judío es única y explícitamente una manifestación radical y de odio y se basa en una creencia religiosa que establece que el pueblo judío, ha sido elegido por Dios y que todos los demás pueblos, que no son humanos ni tienen alma, fueron creados por él para servir a los judíos. El supremacismo blanco tiene más expresiones, que van desde un prejuicio racial negativo o una simple creencia instintiva, hasta doctrinas positivas basadas en el conocimiento biológico y objetivo de las diferentes razas.
Ejemplos de supremacismos raciales

Si el antisemitismo (en realidad antijudaísmo) fue, en el pasado, un concepto relacionado con el nacionalismo, hoy en día, el neoantisemitismo está difundido en casi todas las ideologías.
Y todo aquel que ataque, con razón, el accionar genocida del Estado de Israel será considerado por este estado, y por los judíos de todo el mundo como antisemita, aunque no lo sea.
La historia nos muestra que permanentemente los judíos se presentan como las víctimas de un mundo empecinado a culparlos por sus acciones. En la realidad, dichas víctimas son los victimarios. La realidad así nos lo indica.
Artículo de opinión

Judas, el buen vecino
(autor anónimo)
“ Me mudo a un nuevo barrio y al poco tiempo tengo problemas con un vecino. Discuto, me hostiga, lo denuncio, me discrimina... es un mal vecino... y lo peor es que hay otros vecinos, también muy pero muy malos, que lo apoyan...
Me mudo a otro barrio y otra vez lo mismo. La plaga de los malos vecinos. Me envidian, pienso, son estúpidos y soberbios, están enfermos.... y mientras digo que soy el elegido de dios, me voy mudando de barrio en barrio, cambio de clima, de regiones, cruzo oceános, desiertos, bosques.... pero más tarde o más temprano... en todos lados lo mismo... esos malditos malos vecinos que no me entienden y que me acusan falsamente.
Pasan los años y los años, pasan los siglos, soy el eterno errante... pasan miles de años. No importa las regiones, ni el color de piel o la religión, ni la lengua que hablen mis vecinos, ni el régimen político que los sustente... siempre acabo teniendo problemas... y a los cuatro vientos proclamo y escribo en sagrados papiros mi papel de víctima.
Milenios de malos vecinos que jamás me entendieron... por lo que concluyo, según mi sana e irrefutable lógica, que el problema está en los vecinos, no está en mi.... malditos vecinos...

JarostMarksa escribió:Atentos a esto que me he encontrado, [Tienes que estar registrado y conectado para ver este vínculo] ...


Algunas perlas;

Default Re: Traidores blancos: PEORES que los judíos
Totalmente de acuerdo con el comentario anterior de ItalianNationalist92

El judío es el cerebro o autor intelectual del aniquilamiento de Europa, el musulmán (junto con el negro, el chino o el amerindio) constituye la herramienta que se utiliza para llevar a cabo el proceso. El progre es el tonto útil necesario para convencer a las masas autóctonas de las bondades de llevar a cabo dicho proceso.

Lo que es el tradicional, "divide y vencerás". El judío sabe mucho de esto.

El comunismo bolchevique en su tiempo fue financiado por el sionismo internacional para derrotar al nacionalsocialismo y a Europa.

Aunque es Islam es un enemigo a priori del judío, puede ser utilizado a corto-medio plazo para forzar el aniquilamiento de Europa, tal y como en su día uso al comunismo para el mismo fin.

El judío a lo largo de la historia se ha servido de elementos ajenos para destruir la raza aria, y la caída del Imperio Romano fue un buen ejemplo de ello.

Al judío al fin y al cabo le resulta mucho, pero mucho más peligroso una Europa aria con conciencia racial (o nacionalsocialista) que una Europa musulmana, de hecho el objetivo desde tiempos remotos del judío ha sido el de acabar de una vez y para siempre con la raza aria, y hay que reconocer que esta vez esta muy cerca de conseguirlo.

Mantenerse e insistir en el mensaje, nos enfrentamos con el genocidio de los Blancos y con los perpetradores, los antiblancos. Al hablar con el público en general, no entres en discusiones acerca de conspiraciones judías, familias bancarias, el Nuevo Orden Mundial, etc. El genocidio Blanco es el primer tema que hay que establecer en la conciencia de la población general. Podemos entrar en otras ideas más tarde.

cpablo escribió:Leete este articulo completito, si todavia no lo leiste. No vas a saber si reir o llorar. No tiene pierde
[Tienes que estar registrado y conectado para ver este vínculo]

Es basicamente un manual de "como debe contestar un nazi sobre el tema de las razas". Es lo mas siniestro que lei en años.

Lo copado es que ellos mismos se dan cuenta de la sarta de estupideces que dicen, cuando ponen

Mantenerse e insistir en el mensaje, nos enfrentamos con el genocidio de los Blancos y con los perpetradores, los antiblancos. Al hablar con el público en general, no entres en discusiones acerca de conspiraciones judías, familias bancarias, el Nuevo Orden Mundial, etc. El genocidio Blanco es el primer tema que hay que establecer en la conciencia de la población general. Podemos entrar en otras ideas más tarde.

Terrible, no se quién se digna a hacer este tipo de páginas, pero los que sustentan a estas ideologías no son nenes de pecho, están ligados al poder y a las facciones más reaccionarias y violentas de la burguesía.