Portal
Una pregunta a los amigos maoistas del foro. ¿Me podrían facilitar algun documento del Partido Comunista de Filipinas donde se reclame del marxismo-leninismo-maoismo y estime la Guerra Popular Prolongada como metodo universal para la toma del poder?
Por que me de la sensación de que ambas cuestiones se están afirmando gratuitamente, y aún mas, en contra de lo que afirman los propios camaradas filipinos. Un extracto de la contribución del PCFilipinas en el seminario internacional de Bruselas de mayo del presente año:
What principal form of struggle to pursue, whether violent or nonviolent, depends on the concrete conditions. In certain semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries, where the peasants are the most numerous class, it is possible to wage a protracted people's war
in order to accumulate armed strength for the ultimate overthrow of the reactionary state. But in industrial capitalist countries, it is impossible to wage such a protracted people's war in which a people's army and its areas of operation grow in stages in the countryside. Under conditions when it is not yet possible to transform an imperialist war into a civil war, it is possible to learn the teachings of the great communist leaders on state and revolution, to build self-defense units against the fascist disrupters of strikes and protest mass actions and to arouse, organize and mobilize the people to engage in giant marches and rallies.
Fuente: http://www.icsbrussels.org/ICS/2011/Contributions_to_the_Seminar/SCI2011_Philippines_PCP_EN.doc
Asimismo, en este documento tampoco se habla de marxismo-leninismo-maoismo o de marxismo-leninismo pensamiento Mao Tse Tung, sino de Marxismo-Leninismo.
Communist Parties must strengthen themselves ideologically. They must uphold Marxism-Leninism as the universal theory of the proletariat and apply it on the history and current circumstances of the people's struggle for national and social liberation against imperialism and all reaction. Ideological building is the first requisite in building the revolutionary party of the proletariat. Without theory, there can be no revolutionary party and no revolutionary movement.
Por que me de la sensación de que ambas cuestiones se están afirmando gratuitamente, y aún mas, en contra de lo que afirman los propios camaradas filipinos. Un extracto de la contribución del PCFilipinas en el seminario internacional de Bruselas de mayo del presente año:
What principal form of struggle to pursue, whether violent or nonviolent, depends on the concrete conditions. In certain semi-colonial and semi-feudal countries, where the peasants are the most numerous class, it is possible to wage a protracted people's war
in order to accumulate armed strength for the ultimate overthrow of the reactionary state. But in industrial capitalist countries, it is impossible to wage such a protracted people's war in which a people's army and its areas of operation grow in stages in the countryside. Under conditions when it is not yet possible to transform an imperialist war into a civil war, it is possible to learn the teachings of the great communist leaders on state and revolution, to build self-defense units against the fascist disrupters of strikes and protest mass actions and to arouse, organize and mobilize the people to engage in giant marches and rallies.
Fuente: http://www.icsbrussels.org/ICS/2011/Contributions_to_the_Seminar/SCI2011_Philippines_PCP_EN.doc
Asimismo, en este documento tampoco se habla de marxismo-leninismo-maoismo o de marxismo-leninismo pensamiento Mao Tse Tung, sino de Marxismo-Leninismo.
Communist Parties must strengthen themselves ideologically. They must uphold Marxism-Leninism as the universal theory of the proletariat and apply it on the history and current circumstances of the people's struggle for national and social liberation against imperialism and all reaction. Ideological building is the first requisite in building the revolutionary party of the proletariat. Without theory, there can be no revolutionary party and no revolutionary movement.
